Skip to main content

Aide to China

There’s not a day in the world of money that does not report something about China and its emerging market.  Heck, why not, with a GDP of over 8 TRILLION DOLLARS, twice that of Japan, and 6 TIMES that of the United Kingdom.  China is definitely a powerhouse economy that is really heating up.

Yet, today you can read about this $100 laptop that is being manufactured by a company named Quanta and distributed by Nicholas Negroponte’s One Laptop Per Child non-profit group.  What is the scandal about this laptop?  Well, nothing really, except that it is going to be distributed in CHINA, as well as India, Brazil, Argentina, Egypt, Nigeria, and Thailand.  So what, right?  Well, let’s see what the GDPs of those countries are:

  1. China: $8,859,000,000,000

  2. India: $3,611,000,000,000

  3. Brazil: $1,556,000,000,000

  4. Argentina: $518,100,000,000

  5. Egypt: $303,500,000,000

  6. Nigeria: $174,100,000,000

  7. Thailand: $560,700,000,000

The UK has an estimated GDP of $1,830,000,000,000, which is just above Brazil and half of India.  Yet, why isn’t the UK on that list?  The US is only $12,360,000,000,000, and yet it’s not on the list either.

Then I see Nigeria (LOC.GOV , US State Dept) on there, which is very disturbing.  Nigeria is notorious for its blatant disregard for information security.  A vast majority of identity thieving organizations are based in none other than Nigeria.  So now this wonder group of Negroponte’s is going to distribute laptop computers (along with Google’s help) to the very country that has a problem with information crime. Maybe we should give guns to The Mafia too?

Why don’t we look at some other countries too?  For instance, there is Iran, with a GDP of $561,600,000,000, and a huge population of “disenfranchised” (non-Google search making) people.  They could use some laptops, don’t you think? Saudi Arabia has a GDP of only $338,000,000,000, but they’re not on the list. What about Vietnam with a GDP of $232,200,000,000 – oh, they get a bunch of USAIDE money, so they don’t qualify, right?

Hey, we all know Ireland, right?  We love their whiskey and nifty beer drinking songs, but they didn’t make the list.  Their GDP is a paltry $164,600,000,000, which is LESS than that of Nigeria! I don’t think there’s a whole lot of information crime going on in Ireland, so why not give those honest, whiskey drinking, and potato farming folks a chance at Google? We owe it to them for giving us U2.

Honestly, no aid organization in this world should be giving money to any country that has a GDP like China’s.  China can certainly help its OWN people get access to information.  We do not need to subsidize their internet access any more than China is going to help our poor and “disenfranchised” people in the USA.

Negroponte, give me a break.  Go peddle your money and aid to countries that need medical and potable water services, not nifty search engines and access to Amazon.  Your money can be better spent really helping people rather than contributing a huge amount of waste product to the already unmanageable amount of “information age” waste produced today.  How many more dead computers are going to hit the trash in the next year because of Negroponte’s pathetic effort to “enfranchise” these people? I can think of something better to do with $100,000,000 than to give it to China.

(GDP figures are from the CIA World Fact Book   ChinaView - English - reports that China’s GDP in 2005 was 1.3 TRILLION US, with a growth rate of 9.5%)

(The $100 Laptop )

(The China Development Brief)

Popular posts from this blog

Clustered Foolishness

I had morning coffee with a well respected friend of mine recently. Aside from chatting about the usual wifery and family, we touched on the subject of clustered indices and SQL Server performance. A common misconception in the software industry is that a clustered index will make your database queries faster. In fact, most cases will demonstrate the polar opposite of this assumption. The reason for this misconception is a misunderstanding of how the clustered index works in any database server. A clustered index is a node clustering of records that share a common index value. When you decide on an index strategy for your data, you must consider the range of data to be indexed. Remember back to your data structures classes and what you were taught about hashtable optimizations. A hashtable, which is another way of saying a database index, is just a table of N values that organizes a set of M records in quickly accessible lists that are of order L, where L is significantly less than M. ...
Read more

Deadly Information

Remember back to 2006 when a young girl killed herself [1] , [4] after being tricked and harassed by a faux boy she found on the Web using MySpace. The trial against the faux boy, an adult woman (Lori Drew), did not result in prosecution for the death of Megan, much to the dismay of many.  Yet, today we read about another trial where someone is being accused of second degree murder because they may have mentioned something slanderous about another person who was later killed by a hit man [2] . In this case, though, the person on trial is a former FBI agent who was working deep cover to infiltrate organized crime. In both cases, someone released information to third parties that resulted in the death of another person.  Neither defendant in either of these cases actually committed the act of murder, though. In the case of the FBI agent, though, the murder charge is being taken seriously. Yet, in the MySpace slander case, the murder charge was not taken seriously. How are t...
Read more

Faster Climate Change

CNN reports that a WWF study has found that global climate change is happening faster than predicted in 2007 and that there will not be any arctic ice by 2013, or 2040. [1] Then it goes on to say that global sea level will increase by 1.08 meters by the end of the century, which is 2100, 92 years from now. Quite honestly, nobody really cares what is going to happen to the planet in 98 years. Why? Because in 98 years we (as humans) will either: (1) Obliterate ourselves because God told us to do it. (2) Eat eachother because there will no longer be any land available to grow crops and sustain living quarters for our 50 billion people. (3) Suffocate because our planet will no longer smell nice thanks to 50 billion people producing lots of solid waste in our oceans. (4) Leave the planet because there will no longer be enough fresh water to sustain our lives. Wait a minute. Consider (4) for a moment. Where can we get an abundance of fresh water TODAY? Anyone? Yeah, the arctic! It's goin...
Read more