Skip to main content

Cancer

Looking at a picture of my mother laying in her hospital chair taking her chemo medication makes me think about cyber. Our bodies are a network of connected computers. Blood and lymph are the communication channels that relay information between these computers. The mainframe, of course, is your brain, which is another highly connected network of computers.

When cancer invades it starts by infiltrating a system. The system is homomophic usually, which makes it easier for the cancer (cyber infiltrator) to gain its foothold. Sometimes the infiltrator moves fast and runs through multiple systems wrecking havoc. Yet there are those infiltrators who move slow, learning each system as it goes slowly through the entire system. Nonhodgkins Lymphoma is that slow hacker. That's what my mother has. She's had this for a very long time. Mostly ignored by her "doctors" 8, 12, maybe 30 years ago, finally they see the infiltration and recognize the need to respond.

Once the cancer becomes apparent, like the infiltrator, we struggle to figure out where it started. That's where we need to address the treatment otherwise we just move it around. That sounds exactly like the cat and mouse chase of counter infiltration. How do we backtrack?

None of the medical "doctors" who work on my mother are savvy enough to even think about this concept. They are mostly preoccupied with billing medicare and collecting their fee for their time. The nurses care, but they're so overwhelmed (like those network techs) that they don't have time to think deeply. Who can stomach a deep dive on the root cause when your system is about the suffer a catastrophic failure, right? Dead humans make for bad test subjects.

Let's work backwards from the visible evidence of infiltration. We see the "cancer" tumor which is the equivalent of a malware drop or data erase, or even a damn DNS exfil that the Cisco guy described. How the infiltrator get into that zone? We look at the path you would take, follow the network, the connected lymp tissue and where it could stage. Look for a similar exploit in that staging area and then again, backtrack. Like a worthy infiltrator, you eventually find rings of exploit that lead back to themselves. That's the frustrating part, and it's the part where most just stop looking. There's always a trail, often some escape that transcends the homomorphic nature of the system.

So you jump across system barriers too. Instead of on a Windows system, you look into the Linux network that has a physical separation (maybe it was your IB HPC network). This is akin to looking into the circulatory system (blood) where it intersects with the lymphatic system, i.e. the liver. The liver would be another computing system with an embedded switch. You look for signs of collateral infiltration, for instance signs of renal cancer (she had that a few years ago).

In all of this backtracking you keep looking for the infiltrator. There is a fingerprint out there, there is always a fingerprint. No matter if it's cancer or a hacker, each infiltrator leaves its mark where it started. Not even the most fantastic NSA red team hacker is immune to leaving a trace. Not every trace is measured in the system they infiltrator.

I am a firm believer that most cancers are the result of viral infection that goes unstopped by an immune system. Sometimes that IPS doesn't know how to handle the foreign "zero day" known as cancer. Maybe one day I will be able to reconnect with Travis, the virology cohort I knew during my SERS experience.

Until then, somebody still needs to collect on the $100 challenge. How many neutrons does it take to make a black hole? My hundo awaits...

Popular posts from this blog

THE RISE OF FASCIST SOCIAL MEDIA

The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines fascism as: a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control .  The phrase "dictatorial control" is important for the case that I am going to make about fascism in social media. The word "dictatorial" means "of or relating to a dictator," and a dictator is "one ruling in an absolute and often oppressive way." In 2020, social media has seen a rise in the number of autocratic events of censorship. The two social media outlets that I am going to focus on are Facebook and Twitter.  Background Facebook is a semi-private curated blogging platform where you, the user, share information at your leisure. The public part of Facebook is in Facebook Groups. With a group, outside people who are not privy to your "Facebook Wall" will join your group and establish a communal discourse. This can be private, by invitation only, or public. The Facebook is auth-walled so that you must

DNS Custom Logs and selinux

If you google "named custom logs selinux" you will find quite a bit of chatter about setting up custom logs outside of /var/log for DNS (named). These posts are interesting, but they tend to be run on posts about learning selinux and becoming an expert on named. What you need to know? If you have setup custom logging locations in your /etc/named.conf file, such as:     channel default_file {         file "/var/log/named/default.log" versions 3 size 5m;         severity dynamic;         print-time yes;     }; Then you will likely see errors like this in /var/log/messages: Oct 26 11:41:13 namedsvr setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/named from write access on the directory /var/named/chroot/var/log/named. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l 6eab4aaf-e615-4ade-9e88-4efdc789eaf2 Then you run the sealert command as suggested by the very friendly selinux audit log and you are told: #============= named_t ============== #!

Atoms in The Universe

Computer scientists like to talk about the number of atoms in the universe when talking about computational complexity. If you have 10**100 nodes to evaluate, and there are only 10**86 atoms in the universe, then there is no way to compute your node tree. 10**86 atoms? Where does that number come from? Who made this up. In [1] the claim is that there are 10**86 hydrogen atoms out there. That seems like alot, right? Remember Avogadro? He came up with a number too [2]. His number is 6.022 x 10**23 atoms per mole. That's alot of atoms too, right? Hmm. If you had one cubic mole of something, how many atoms are in there? Well, that's (10**23)**3, or about 10**69. That's not 10**86, but it's close. How many cubic moles are 10**86 atoms then? Well, about 86/69, or about 1.25 cubic moles. So the total sum of all atoms in the universe is just 1.25 cubic moles? Or rather, let's topsy turvy this. There are more atoms in 1.3 cubic moles of water than the universe. Ah