Skip to main content

Robot Me

Some time ago, feels like years, my cousin's daughter proclaimed that she wanted to be a robot. She was 6 at the time, I think. Samurai Lucy probably knows the exact date of this conversation I had with my cousin, as it was on facebook.

I told my cousin that her daughter was the greatest robot ever built. Indeed we are. Our soft bodies are cushions for the hard endoskeleton that keeps our body able to be rigid. We have control circuitry distributed throughout our bodies with a central computer. That central computer is controlled by an expert system that knows how to integrate signals and train several connected neural networks.

We are the greatest robot ever built because we are self-locomotive. We create our own energy, don't need to get an external battery to replace old ones. Our computer is capable of work using single electrons and their quantum spin. Our ligature learns how to adapt to its environment, like those incredible Boston Dynamics [1] robots.

We are the greatest robot ever built because we are self propagating. This is an important distinction because it supports panspermia [2]. From a tiny sperm with half of the host DNA and a gigantic egg with a whole bunch of DNA, their combination as a single cell turns into a trillion cells capable of writing this blog.

Imagine those BD guys making those robots. One day they think, hey, how small can we make these robots. So they make lots of tiny robots, and even more tiny robots, and then nanoscale robots [3]. Now how do we make more of these monsters? That's tough, because we're manufacturing stuff, and that makes for waste and inefficiency. So those BD guys get to thinking again. How do we get this robot to make itself.

So they make two pieces from a host. One that is the real host, the egg cell, with programming and capability to divide and make more of itself. Then the other is the "randomizer" code that is used to diversify the robots. Diversity is the mission profile of science, so these robots were made for scientific exploration.

Where do we get the raw resources to make the robot, though? That's dirt. From dirt we get "food" which is just fancy dirt. Put that into a chemical reactor and pull off some carbon, oxygen, water, and electrons, and now you have a fuel cell. To clean up the chem byproduct, we can use bacteria (specialized nano robots) to convert even more complex molecular products.

Now we have a fully operational robot that can adapt to its environment, propagate itself, and create its own energy. It can also heal itself when it is damaged, and in some cases, can even grow new support "organs." [4]

Imagine you are stuck on a planet too, just like us. You create robotic satellites that explore the galaxy, and you send some robots out there like our Curiosity rover. They break and the mission is over. That really stinks. So you ask these BD guys to create you a dynamic robot that will not break so easily. You can't send it in a long space mission because it needs energy, so you keep it in a simple form, the two part DNA package (sperm and egg) and send it out into space. [5]

The real question is how do you communicate with your space fairing robot? Do you program quantum entanglement so the robot's brain entangles with the origin system? Until we find a way to detect quantum entangled communication we will never know for sure. If it is entanglement, then we should be able to detect it across both space and time.

[1] Boston Dynamics
[2] Panspermia
[3] Nanorobotics
[4] Organ Repair and Regeneration
[5] Daily Mail - Titanium Germ Ball and Huffigton Post - Alien Seed

Popular posts from this blog

The Spinning Brain

Intuition is a phenomenon of the biological brain that doesn't have any physical explanation. Many people experience intuition with varying degrees of success. There are a variety of theories regarding intuition [1] and some people regard intuition with much caution [2] . Yet, I am happily in the camp that has learned to respect my intuition as it has proven time and time again to be correct. Recently, though, I'd been thinking about intuition and soothsaying . There are many cases of people who claim to see the future, whatever that might be. Maybe there is something to be said about this mystical phenomenon. Maybe there is a real physical process at work that we just haven't thought of yet. To this end, I am proposing a theory about human intuition. This theory, though requires some background in quantum mechanics . Specifically, quantum entanglement . I'm not the only person who has theorized about quantum entanglement and its role in biological congnition and th...

Stock Option Debt Income

The 2024 Presidential election has brought out a topic of interest that seems to have been perverted. There is this "Taxing Unrealized Capital Gains" [1] movement that is being falsely attributed to Vice President Harris. Clearly, this is a change in the revenue code that was designed by someone in office long before VP Harris was in office. My money is on Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders. What is this change in the revenue code though? For that you have to understand what Silicon Valley zillionaires are doing with their stock options. Many of these people in this special economic area have huge discounts on stock prices for companies that are not public yet, or are public and can not be sold [2]. To be fair to these holders of equity, banks allow them to finance debt using leverage against those options. If you hold an option that is worth $5M then a bank might lend you a share of that value, thus realizing a debt against the option [3]. This is a fair debt instrument and...

Number of Primes

Anderson's Theorem (a) The number of primes in [1,n] is no more than 2+floor(n/2). The probability of n being prime when n is not prime is 1/2 - see Dasgupta,Papadimitriou,Vazirani "Algorithms" page 26. Therefore, the E(pi(n)) is n/2. (b) There does not exist another set of adjacent primes other than {1,2,3} 5: 2 + floor(5/2) = 2 + 2 = 4:=> {1,2,3,5} : 4 <= 4 7: 2 + floor(7/2) = 2 + 3 = 5 => {1,2,3,5,7} : 5 <= 5 11: 2 + floor(11/2) = 2 + 5 = 7 => {1,2,3,5,7,11} 6 <= 7 26: 2 + floor(26/2) = 15 => {1,2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23} : 10 <= 15 Lagrange's Theorem is Inaccurate Lagrange's theorem about primes states that pi(x) is the number of primes <= x. The pi(x) is approximately x/ln(x). He postulated that the lim of pi(x)/(x/lnx) as x-> infinity was 1. This is incorrect. if the number of primes is bounded by n/2 then refactoring and reducing Lagrange's Theorem results in the lim of ln(x) as x approaches infinity. This is alwa...