Skip to main content

The Hack on HACK

Pull up Bing (www.bing.com) and search on "Hack Fund." There you will see the PureFunds ISE Cyber Security ETF [2]. This is an exchange traded fund [1], meaning that a constellation of computers is constantly monitoring this fund's price and making long and short positions to take micro profits all through the trading day.

The fund is made up of security technology companies who are directly involved in the infosec world. You will have to become an investor in the fund to get the full prospectus of the funds that are being traded. On the PureFunds web site [2] you can see the top 10 holdings in the fund, such as IL, SAIC, PFPT, FTNT, SPLK. Wait, Splunk? Indeed, the log file analysis company, Splunk, Inc. [3], is part of the HACK fund. That's an interesting addition to the fund.

This post is not about the analysis of the holdings, but rather a warning about the fund. Recently Kaspersky Labs claimed to have been hacked by external "nation state" hackers [4]. You have to wonder why Kaspersky would ever disclose their own security breach. Kaspersky benefits from claiming to be hacked because it shows their vulnerability and lessens their "untouchable" status. This is exactly why the C.I.A. claims to have had their public web sites hacked in the past. You should doubt the sincerity of these claims from Kaspersky, or any AV software provider. These companies are just trying to manipulate the hacker's opinion on whether or not these companies are worthy of attack.

Back to the HACK fund and what it means to you. Every company listed in the holdings is an attack vector for the young and aspiring "Wind Ninja." I call them Wind Ninjas because I once tracked a team down to Uruguay and their monikers were the Japanese names for some mythical "Ninja" spirits, one in particular was a "Wind Ninja." These hackers, like you, have money in their pockets, time on their hands, but unlike you, they enjoy disrupting public opinion. Now they have a passive way of making use of their time and money. You won't be seeing much from the ransom ware people anymore because they can invest their $18M [5] in the HACK fund. Once invested in HACK, the hackers will then continue to drive more and more hacker activity, raising the public awareness (and scare-o-meter) of hacking, and thus increasing the value of their equity position.

This all reminds me of the Dilbert "$10 bug fix." (no citation, sorry) Remember that strip, where Dilbert's team gets paid $10 per bug fixed. So what does he do? Make lots and lots of bugs, and then fix them quickly, thus printing his own money. You can bet the hackers of the world are reading Dilbert and they are all moving their money into the HACK fund [8]. The growth of the fund has exceeded $1B in assets [10], which is serious money now. You can bet there will be some hefty manipulation in this fund. We have already seen some hints of it [8] after the SONY hack.

Now for some stock advice. First you get a team of hackers together, some kids from a local high school. Then you invest your money in HACK. Next, teach the kids how to hack and get them to go after some mid-level business. Once the hack is exposed, the HACK fund will go up in value, and you sell. Boom, you owe me 1% bro!

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchange-traded_fund
[2] http://www.pureetfs.com/etfs/hack.html
[3] http://www.splunk.com/
[4] http://www.eweek.com/security/kaspersky-hack-reveals-conflict-between-spy-agencies-security-firms.html
[5] http://www.darkreading.com/endpoint/fbi-cryptowall-ransomware-cost-us-users-$18-million/d/d-id/1321030
[6] http://etfdb.com/2014/inside-the-cyber-security-etf-hack-qa-with-christian-magoon
[7] http://seekingalpha.com/article/2680305-finally-a-cyber-security-etf
[8] http://www.ibtimes.com/new-cybersecurity-etf-hack-sees-shares-jump-after-sony-hack-increased-security-1763538
[9] http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/may/21/trinity-mirror-alleged-phone-hacking-payout-fund-sunday-people
[10] http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20150618005830/en/PureFunds-ISE-Cyber-Security-ETF%E2%84%A2-HACK-Surpasses#.VZK3Bk_bKUk

Popular posts from this blog

The Spinning Brain

Intuition is a phenomenon of the biological brain that doesn't have any physical explanation. Many people experience intuition with varying degrees of success. There are a variety of theories regarding intuition [1] and some people regard intuition with much caution [2] . Yet, I am happily in the camp that has learned to respect my intuition as it has proven time and time again to be correct. Recently, though, I'd been thinking about intuition and soothsaying . There are many cases of people who claim to see the future, whatever that might be. Maybe there is something to be said about this mystical phenomenon. Maybe there is a real physical process at work that we just haven't thought of yet. To this end, I am proposing a theory about human intuition. This theory, though requires some background in quantum mechanics . Specifically, quantum entanglement . I'm not the only person who has theorized about quantum entanglement and its role in biological congnition and th...
Read more

Stock Option Debt Income

The 2024 Presidential election has brought out a topic of interest that seems to have been perverted. There is this "Taxing Unrealized Capital Gains" [1] movement that is being falsely attributed to Vice President Harris. Clearly, this is a change in the revenue code that was designed by someone in office long before VP Harris was in office. My money is on Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders. What is this change in the revenue code though? For that you have to understand what Silicon Valley zillionaires are doing with their stock options. Many of these people in this special economic area have huge discounts on stock prices for companies that are not public yet, or are public and can not be sold [2]. To be fair to these holders of equity, banks allow them to finance debt using leverage against those options. If you hold an option that is worth $5M then a bank might lend you a share of that value, thus realizing a debt against the option [3]. This is a fair debt instrument and...
Read more

Number of Primes

Anderson's Theorem (a) The number of primes in [1,n] is no more than 2+floor(n/2). The probability of n being prime when n is not prime is 1/2 - see Dasgupta,Papadimitriou,Vazirani "Algorithms" page 26. Therefore, the E(pi(n)) is n/2. (b) There does not exist another set of adjacent primes other than {1,2,3} 5: 2 + floor(5/2) = 2 + 2 = 4:=> {1,2,3,5} : 4 <= 4 7: 2 + floor(7/2) = 2 + 3 = 5 => {1,2,3,5,7} : 5 <= 5 11: 2 + floor(11/2) = 2 + 5 = 7 => {1,2,3,5,7,11} 6 <= 7 26: 2 + floor(26/2) = 15 => {1,2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23} : 10 <= 15 Lagrange's Theorem is Inaccurate Lagrange's theorem about primes states that pi(x) is the number of primes <= x. The pi(x) is approximately x/ln(x). He postulated that the lim of pi(x)/(x/lnx) as x-> infinity was 1. This is incorrect. if the number of primes is bounded by n/2 then refactoring and reducing Lagrange's Theorem results in the lim of ln(x) as x approaches infinity. This is alwa...
Read more