Skip to main content

Typical Fall From Grace

I have had an Apple device in my life since 1990. My first Apple computer was a Mac SE which was my second computer, the first being a Commodore 64. The Mac SE was a beautiful design, smoother, encephalon like form that was entirely contained. It was the second generation of Apple's unified hardware design, something copied only in the mid 2000's by Hewlett Packard. When Steve Jobs left Apple in the 90s we saw a diversion in Apple's aesthetic designs. They moved away from the unibody computer and moved forward with the pizza box architecture that plagued the IBM PC/x86 world. They still had the characteristic platinum coloring of their units, but now you had a bunch of boxes that ran Apple software. It all stopped looking like Apple.

Jobs continued with his own aesthetic designs at NeXT, but that did not go well. While he tried to realize the greater encephalon design (that's a computer that looks like a head, by the way), the software didn't have the stability that Apple had to offer. Jobs needed Steve, and Steve needed Jobs, and together they needed Apple. This was all too obvious when Apple started producing new computer models twice yearly, each more competitive than the other, but each competing with its siblings.

When Jobs returned to Apple we didn't see technology innovation. That was already done by the likes of HP, Compaq, Microsoft, and Symbian. What those innovators all lacked was the aesthetic genius that Steve Jobs saw in the world. So when Apple released the iPod and then iPhone, it wasn't a technical innovation, rather it was an aesthetic innovation in technology. It was then in 2007 that technology needed to be more pretty than functional, and that's what Steve Jobs knew how to do.

That's why today I am writing this fun opinion piece about my iPhone 6 Plus. I have just about every kind of phone, from a Samsung Galaxy generation 1, to a new Galaxy Note 2, to iPhone 4, iPhone 5, HTC Windows Phone, and Nokia Lumia. These phones are all smooth bricks with shiny OLED screens. The Nokia phones were the most stylish of the non-Apple phones, and they all had a very common feature. The phones didn't have warts.

A wart is anything that sticks out from a surface. On the back side of these phones there is a nifty camera lens that is hidden in the surface to keep it safe. That countersink on the lens also causes flash glare and can disrupt the quality of the photos taken by the device. That's why the original iPhone was white, and always white for a long time. A black shiny surface causes a nasty lens flare from the flash and results in junk pictures. Steve Jobs knew that was important as a mission critical feature of the mobile phone. Even my Qualcomm Brew phone (Kyocera) got that right, with its recessed lens for photographs.

Today, though, I noticed that my iPhone 6 Plus does not have a recessed lens. Rather, the lens sticks out like an ugly wart. it has a metal ring around the lens to protect it, but that still it's a wart. Warts always snag on things, and the wart on the iPhone 6 will not disappoint in that regard. Furthermore, the wart causes the iPhone 6 Plus to never rest level on any surface. Now the iPhone only has three contact points with its host surface, which means less friction to keep it on a slanted surface, and a higher likelihood of it slipping off a closed laptop and falling onto the floor.

Some may argue that this was Steve Jobs' design idea, or that he approved it before his passing. I doubt that argument's validity having seen Steve Jobs' unique approach to aesthetic technical design. The device is a failure in my opinion. The sales of the iPhone 6 Plus should be halted and the lens should be recessed. Every mobile device should lay flat and stable on a flat surface.

Popular posts from this blog

Clustered Foolishness

I had morning coffee with a well respected friend of mine recently. Aside from chatting about the usual wifery and family, we touched on the subject of clustered indices and SQL Server performance. A common misconception in the software industry is that a clustered index will make your database queries faster. In fact, most cases will demonstrate the polar opposite of this assumption. The reason for this misconception is a misunderstanding of how the clustered index works in any database server. A clustered index is a node clustering of records that share a common index value. When you decide on an index strategy for your data, you must consider the range of data to be indexed. Remember back to your data structures classes and what you were taught about hashtable optimizations. A hashtable, which is another way of saying a database index, is just a table of N values that organizes a set of M records in quickly accessible lists that are of order L, where L is significantly less than M. ...

Deadly Information

Remember back to 2006 when a young girl killed herself [1] , [4] after being tricked and harassed by a faux boy she found on the Web using MySpace. The trial against the faux boy, an adult woman (Lori Drew), did not result in prosecution for the death of Megan, much to the dismay of many.  Yet, today we read about another trial where someone is being accused of second degree murder because they may have mentioned something slanderous about another person who was later killed by a hit man [2] . In this case, though, the person on trial is a former FBI agent who was working deep cover to infiltrate organized crime. In both cases, someone released information to third parties that resulted in the death of another person.  Neither defendant in either of these cases actually committed the act of murder, though. In the case of the FBI agent, though, the murder charge is being taken seriously. Yet, in the MySpace slander case, the murder charge was not taken seriously. How are t...

Faster Climate Change

CNN reports that a WWF study has found that global climate change is happening faster than predicted in 2007 and that there will not be any arctic ice by 2013, or 2040. [1] Then it goes on to say that global sea level will increase by 1.08 meters by the end of the century, which is 2100, 92 years from now. Quite honestly, nobody really cares what is going to happen to the planet in 98 years. Why? Because in 98 years we (as humans) will either: (1) Obliterate ourselves because God told us to do it. (2) Eat eachother because there will no longer be any land available to grow crops and sustain living quarters for our 50 billion people. (3) Suffocate because our planet will no longer smell nice thanks to 50 billion people producing lots of solid waste in our oceans. (4) Leave the planet because there will no longer be enough fresh water to sustain our lives. Wait a minute. Consider (4) for a moment. Where can we get an abundance of fresh water TODAY? Anyone? Yeah, the arctic! It's goin...