Skip to main content

More Climate Misconceptions

I was reading the New Scientist today and found an article about the Global Warming/Climate Change debate that is raging today.

Page 2 of this article (Deniergate: Turning the tables on climate sceptics) makes a statement that is, well, sophomoric:

"The UK Met Office this week published data showing that the first decade of the 2000s has been the warmest on record."

A very long time ago, this planet was covered in ice and snow. Slowly, this global "ice age" receded and has gradually given rise to the modern world of today (2009). Yet, there are still large ice sheets on the planet (the Arctic and Antarctic Poles) that are continuing to melt.

For these large sheets of ice to melt, the average atmospheric temperature of the planet must increase. Without that increase, we would still have more ice and snow, and likely no humans and fancy fast cars. Therefore, it goes without saying that the Plant's average temperature is increasing, and it HAS been increasing for a very very very long time. We are all glad it has, because I could not write this critique without it being a balmy 75 degrees Farenheit outside today.

Imagine for a moment if you lived your entire life in a moving car. As a child, you never noticed that it was moving fast, so you just lived your life happy, playing with your toys. Then one day, self awareness started, and you noticed your surroundings moving fast. Bumps would jostle your body and your head would bounce about like a balloon. Now you're a little older, and the car is still going the same speed, but you care a little more about yourself. You realize "hey, we're moving fast, we better slow down," much to the dismay of the older and wiser operators of the car.

Humans, today, are in this point of reference. We are seeing now that the planet is warm, warmer than it was a thousand years ago. Yet we have eaten billions of fish and shat billions of tons of waste in those thousand years too. Are we drowning in our waste? Are there still fish in the Oceans? Yes, and no, mostly.

Anyone who claims to have any clear answers about "Global Climate Change" today is nothing more than a fool. We've only managed to monitor climate on this plant for a few hundred years (with any respectable accuracy). That's just a passing fart in the nearly 5 BILLION years of this planet's life. Yet, there are a bunch of misguided people at this Copenhagen Summit, causing "constructive violence" in protest of climate control policies and "elitism."

I had a chat once with one of those misguided "eco-terrorist" types. She had some very misinformed ideas about farm subsidies, government involvement in crop rotations, and trade negotiations. These people are given a little information and told to "fight the good fight," in the name of human preservation. They rarely research on their own, and seek out self-fulfilling half-truths to further their agendas.

There isn't any "Climate Crisis" yet. This planet is going through its own natural climate changes that it has experienced consistently in its lifetime. We are at the final stage of the current global warming trend (Heleocene) and will be entering into a global ice age soon (5,000 to 10,000 years).

Humans will no longer be on this planet in 5,000 years though. Our adolescent view of the world is ending and, like all adolescents, we must grow up and leave the comforts of our nests. The time, effort, and money that we waste on this "Global Climate" debate can be better served solving real social issues on this planet.

Children are murdered and raped every day on this planet, and yet we are spending billions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of hours worrying about what will happen on this planet in 100, 200, 500 years? We have giant ice bergs of fresh water floating in our oceans, and yet we need to build desalination facilities to extract fresh water from our coastal waters?

The absurdity of this debate and our times makes me think that Monty Python is behind this global comedy. Are we living the Flying Circus?

Popular posts from this blog

Clustered Foolishness

I had morning coffee with a well respected friend of mine recently. Aside from chatting about the usual wifery and family, we touched on the subject of clustered indices and SQL Server performance. A common misconception in the software industry is that a clustered index will make your database queries faster. In fact, most cases will demonstrate the polar opposite of this assumption. The reason for this misconception is a misunderstanding of how the clustered index works in any database server. A clustered index is a node clustering of records that share a common index value. When you decide on an index strategy for your data, you must consider the range of data to be indexed. Remember back to your data structures classes and what you were taught about hashtable optimizations. A hashtable, which is another way of saying a database index, is just a table of N values that organizes a set of M records in quickly accessible lists that are of order L, where L is significantly less than M. ...

Deadly Information

Remember back to 2006 when a young girl killed herself [1] , [4] after being tricked and harassed by a faux boy she found on the Web using MySpace. The trial against the faux boy, an adult woman (Lori Drew), did not result in prosecution for the death of Megan, much to the dismay of many.  Yet, today we read about another trial where someone is being accused of second degree murder because they may have mentioned something slanderous about another person who was later killed by a hit man [2] . In this case, though, the person on trial is a former FBI agent who was working deep cover to infiltrate organized crime. In both cases, someone released information to third parties that resulted in the death of another person.  Neither defendant in either of these cases actually committed the act of murder, though. In the case of the FBI agent, though, the murder charge is being taken seriously. Yet, in the MySpace slander case, the murder charge was not taken seriously. How are t...

Faster Climate Change

CNN reports that a WWF study has found that global climate change is happening faster than predicted in 2007 and that there will not be any arctic ice by 2013, or 2040. [1] Then it goes on to say that global sea level will increase by 1.08 meters by the end of the century, which is 2100, 92 years from now. Quite honestly, nobody really cares what is going to happen to the planet in 98 years. Why? Because in 98 years we (as humans) will either: (1) Obliterate ourselves because God told us to do it. (2) Eat eachother because there will no longer be any land available to grow crops and sustain living quarters for our 50 billion people. (3) Suffocate because our planet will no longer smell nice thanks to 50 billion people producing lots of solid waste in our oceans. (4) Leave the planet because there will no longer be enough fresh water to sustain our lives. Wait a minute. Consider (4) for a moment. Where can we get an abundance of fresh water TODAY? Anyone? Yeah, the arctic! It's goin...