Skip to main content

A Test for SETI

I am a big fan of SETI, the search for extraterrestrial intelligence. If you don't know much about the SETI project, then take a look at seti.org. Buy some stuff there too so that you can support their mission, which is to find some proof that advanced life exists outside of Planet Earth.

How do we know that SETI is really doing the right thing, though? Can you possibly expect to detect any signal at all from 5 light years away using a planetary network of telescopes? One would think not because a radio wave gets wider (dispersion) as it travels farther. As it disperses, its energy dampens, and eventually the incident energy is slow low that it can not be detected above the background noise. Essentially, the noise we hear in the cosmic background, is made up of widely dispersed radio waves that have been bouncing around for billions of earth years.

Is there a way to test out the SETI thesis and make some use of their telescope network? Well, if you're a fan of the Pioneer space probes, then you might think along the lines of this thought too. Pioneer 10 is outside of our solar system, or so we think. Its radio telemetry is getting very faint for lots of reasons, one of which is its distance, and the other its weak transmitter power.

If SETI truly can detect a radio signal at 4.2 light years, then it should be able to easily pick up the weak Pioneer 10 signal. About 5 years ago, Pioneer was 7.5 billion miles away from earth, which is about 0.00128 light years away, or a fraction of the distance to our closest solar neighbor, Proxima Centauri.

SETI, are you up for the challenge? Turn your network at Pioneer 10 and tell us what it is saying. If you can't pick up Pioneer 10, then you're likely not going to pickup anything from Proxima Centauri, or any other extrasolar system. Pioneer 10 is so close, that its signal should be as if it were shouting at you. How could you fail?

If SETI fails to pickup the Pioneer probe, then maybe we can divert their money to other more useful endeavors, like global water reclamation and treatment, or Project Longshot. I certainly want to know if SETI's extensive terrestrial radio array can pickup the closest KNOWN radio signal from an advanced civilization. If nothing else, it will confirm that our money is being well spent on useful research.

Popular posts from this blog

Number of Primes

Anderson's Theorem (a) The number of primes in [1,n] is no more than 2+floor(n/2). The probability of n being prime when n is not prime is 1/2 - see Dasgupta,Papadimitriou,Vazirani "Algorithms" page 26. Therefore, the E(pi(n)) is n/2. (b) There does not exist another set of adjacent primes other than {1,2,3} 5: 2 + floor(5/2) = 2 + 2 = 4:=> {1,2,3,5} : 4 <= 4 7: 2 + floor(7/2) = 2 + 3 = 5 => {1,2,3,5,7} : 5 <= 5 11: 2 + floor(11/2) = 2 + 5 = 7 => {1,2,3,5,7,11} 6 <= 7 26: 2 + floor(26/2) = 15 => {1,2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23} : 10 <= 15 Lagrange's Theorem is Inaccurate Lagrange's theorem about primes states that pi(x) is the number of primes <= x. The pi(x) is approximately x/ln(x). He postulated that the lim of pi(x)/(x/lnx) as x-> infinity was 1. This is incorrect. if the number of primes is bounded by n/2 then refactoring and reducing Lagrange's Theorem results in the lim of ln(x) as x approaches infinity. This is alwa...

How To Cancel ATT Uverse

I was a subscriber to the AT&T Uverse service for a little over 2 years. In that time, we had experienced good service for the first year, and then it sucked. After 12 months, or there in, the service degraded quickly, and would stop working all together at times. At first it would die for a short period of time, usually when we were not home. Then it would get progressively worst, until there was an entire week of no service. We had technicians at the house trying to fix the service, but it would repeat the behavior quite consistently. On January 15th we finally gave up and switched to a lesser service, COX TV and Internet. In the past we had cable service and it was always reliable, but not as good as the AT&T digital service. COX doesn't have nearly as many HD channels, but that's not enough. We needed internet to be reliable, and AT&T couldn't deliver that. Cancelling the AT&T service was a nightmare. Try to find anything about such things on their web s...

DNS Custom Logs and selinux

If you google "named custom logs selinux" you will find quite a bit of chatter about setting up custom logs outside of /var/log for DNS (named). These posts are interesting, but they tend to be run on posts about learning selinux and becoming an expert on named. What you need to know? If you have setup custom logging locations in your /etc/named.conf file, such as:     channel default_file {         file "/var/log/named/default.log" versions 3 size 5m;         severity dynamic;         print-time yes;     }; Then you will likely see errors like this in /var/log/messages: Oct 26 11:41:13 namedsvr setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/named from write access on the directory /var/named/chroot/var/log/named. For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l 6eab4aaf-e615-4ade-9e88-4efdc789eaf2 Then you run the sealert command as suggested by the very friendly selinux audit log and yo...